,jpeg/015/805/922/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/017/748/181/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/016/949/466/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/020/232/032/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/018/870/040/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/001/387/770/1280x720.2.jpg)
,jpeg/006/868/729/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/007/380/641/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/008/252/111/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/006/687/020/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/018/693/991/1280x720.7.jpg)
コメント数
13
Hot mistresses. Hot scene. Shitty camera work.
Why would you aim the camera to cut off the dommes' faces and most of their hot, sexily dressed bodies, but get all of the guy? Isn't this intended for an audience of straight guys? We didn't come to check out Baldilocks here.
I'm not trying to be a complainer here, but this is such a common error in femdom porn. I know I speak for the vast majority of the jack-off community when I say that we came here for the sexy dominatrix, not the naked dude. How do the producers not know this?
Why would you aim the camera to cut off the dommes' faces and most of their hot, sexily dressed bodies, but get all of the guy? Isn't this intended for an audience of straight guys? We didn't come to check out Baldilocks here.
I'm not trying to be a complainer here, but this is such a common error in femdom porn. I know I speak for the vast majority of the jack-off community when I say that we came here for the sexy dominatrix, not the naked dude. How do the producers not know this?